Contents
The Common Core State Standards Initiative is an educational initiative from 2010 that details what K–12 students throughout the United States should know in English language arts and mathematics at the conclusion of each school grade.
The Common Core State Standards are dead. … “And at the U.S. Department of Education, Common Core is dead,” she declared. In Florida, Governor Ron DeSantis just announced that the work of “rooting out all vestiges of Common Core” done, and new standards would now replace the old, unloved ones.
The magnitude of the negative effects [of Common Core] tend to increase over time. … Some blame the failure of Common Core on process issues, such as lack of adequate teacher training, but the key culprits are the standards themselves and the type of teaching promoted by Common Core.
The four states that never adopted the Standards are Virginia, Texas, Alaska, and Nebraska. The four states who have successfully withdrawn from the curriculum are Arizona, Oklahoma, Indiana, and South Carolina.
States were given an incentive to adopt the Common Core Standards through the possibility of competitive federal Race to the Top grants. U.S. President Barack Obama and U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan announced the Race to the Top competitive grants on July 24, 2009, as a motivator for education reform.
So why do so many people hate the Common Core? … While the goals of Common Core are laudable, many parents and teachers don’t think they had a seat at the table when standards were developed. To parents and teachers who feel they were entirely left out of the process, the standards may feel heavy-handed.
While the majority of teachers, 57 percent, say Common Core will be positive for most students, a third don’t think it will make a difference. Eight percent say it will be negative. Elementary school teachers have a sunnier outlook on the standards than middle and high school teachers.
Common Core has been controversial since the beginning. While some people hailed it as a much-needed educational reform that would correct equity issues and improve education in a global society, others saw it as an infringement on state’s rights issues, especially in light of way it was tied to federal funding.
While the evidence indicates that Common Core failed to improve academic achievement, the standards did prompt states to raise their benchmarks for student learning.
Unlike traditional methods in the U.S. that stress memorization, Japanese math emphasizes problem solving. Its sansu arithmetic aligns with the Common Core standards, providing a strong incentive for teachers to adopt the pedagogy. … It’s an invaluable way for teachers to improve their instruction.
In 1958, President Eisenhower signed the National Defense Education Act, which poured money into the American education system at all levels. One result of this was the so-called New Math, which focused more on conceptual understanding of mathematics over rote memorization of arithmetic.
NCLB and Common Core
The NCLB, passed in 2001, can be considered a precursor to Common Core. … The NCLB also implemented standardized testing in several K-12 grades, with test scores to be reported and published by school, school district, and state.
Common Core
Obama didn’t create the Core; he fast-tracked adoption. His administration also used $350 million to bankroll two testing consortia, PARCC and Smarter Balanced, that would develop standardized tests aligned to these new standards.
In 2017, US Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos told a radio audience, “There isn’t really any Common Core anymore,” and she emphatically declared to a 2018 audience at the American Enterprise Institute, “Common Core is dead.” A year later, the governors of two states, Florida and Georgia, announced plans to end Common …
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) was the previous reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. Passed by Congress in 2001 with clear bipartisan support, NCLB was signed into law by President George W. Bush in January of 2002.
The Common Core State Standards for Mathematical Practice were designed to reform the American education system, with three main goals: … Boost math test scores for all American students. Smooth out the differences between individual state curriculums and practices.
Myth: The Common Core State Standards are not internationally benchmarked. Fact: Standards from top-performing countries played a significant role in the development of the math and English language arts/literacy standards.
Here’s What You Need to Know. New York leaders have approved a new set of reading and math expectations for students, moving the state a step away from the Common Core State Standards, which are still in use in some 36 states.
New York’s Board of Regents voted in committee Monday to replace the Common Core standards with the “Next Generation Learning Standards.” It’s official: New York has moved to adopt a revised set of learning standards that, among other changes, ditches the politically charged “Common Core” moniker.
Common Core is a group of K-12 English and math standards designed to standardize educational requirements and increase rigor in school curricula. The purpose of these standards is to prepare students for college and career work and to ensure students in different states are all learning the same things.
What is the Common Core? State education chiefs and governors in 48 states came together to develop the Common Core, a set of clear college- and career-ready standards for kindergarten through 12th grade in English language arts/literacy and mathematics.
Singapore Math closely aligns with the Common Core State Standards Initiative, which may be positive or negative, depending on your views about Common Core.