Case Law also states that when a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, he then loses subject matter jurisdiction and the Judges orders are void, of no legal force or affect.
Although judges should be independent, they must comply with the law and should comply with this Code. … They should be applied consistently with constitutional requirements, statutes, other court rules and decisional law, and in the context of all relevant circumstances.
You may file a complaint about a federal judge who you have reason to believe has committed misconduct or has a disability that interferes with the performance of their judicial duties.
Supreme Court: The Supreme Court holds the power to overturn laws and executive actions they deem unlawful or unconstitutional. The Supreme Court cannot directly enforce its rulings, but it relies on respect for the Constitution and for the law for adherence to its judgments.
Judges may be impeached by majority vote of the legislature and removed with the concurrence of two thirds of the members of the court of impeachment. The supreme court sits as the court of impeachment, unless a supreme court justice has been impeached.
Perjury. Perjury is the criminal act of lying or making statements to misrepresent something while under oath. Lying under oath disrupts the judicial process and is taken very seriously. Being convicted of perjury can result in serious consequences, including probation and fines.
The answer is yes he could. It doesn’t mean it’s the right decision, but since the Judge controls everything that happens in the courtroom, he controls what comes into evidence. If the judge makes the wrong decision and I ultimately lose the case, I can appeal on that precise issue.
Judicial corruption includes the misuse of judicial funds and power, such as when a judge hires family members to staff the court or manipulates contracts for court construction and equipment.
You can’t write to the judge. You can hire your own attorney to make your case to the court.
The courts apply the law, and settle disputes and punish law-breakers according to the law. Our judicial system is a key aspect of our democratic way of life. … A court’s ability to deliver justice depends on its power to enforce its rulings. Only a court of appeal can overturn the ruling of a lower court.
“The rule of per incuriam can be applied where a court omits to consider a binding precedent of the same court or the superior court rendered on the same issue or where a court omits to consider any statute while deciding that issue.” 142. In a Constitution Bench judgment of this Court in Union of India v.
Internal accountability to “the judiciary”
In the sense that their decisions are subject to appeal and other judges are responsible for the allocation of cases to them, individual judges are accountable to senior judges or judges holding positions of responsibility.
In the United States the constitution provides that federal judges hold office during good behaviour and may be removed by means of impeachment by the House of Representatives and trial and conviction by the Senate, the stated grounds of removal being “Treason, Bribery or other high Crimes and Misdemeanours”.
Yes. Particularly, concludes Jack Fernandez, the author of “An Essay Concerning the Indictment of Lawyers for their Legal Advice,” when the legal advice is not only specious but involves a strong element of self-dealing.
A narcissist is arrogant. They look down on other people and require constant or excessive admiration. They are jealous of people they perceive to have more authority, wealth, or talent than they possess. … A judge can see firsthand the combative, abusive, and controlling nature of the narcissistic parent.
Anything the witness said or wrote themselves, including text messages, social media posts, and voicemails, are generally admissible in family court. If they said something in such a message that directly contradicts what they said on the stand, you can use that evidence to prove that they’re lying.
“You’re wrong (or words to that effect)” Never, ever tell a judge that he or she is wrong or mistaken. Instead, respectfully tell the judge WHY he or she may be wrong or mistaken.
The court decisions they make can have a lasting impact on the direction of our country. As a co-equal branch of government, the judiciary must remain impartial and non-political in order to do its job. The judges that President Trump has nominated, and the Senate has confirmed, understand this.
Judges in the United States are immune from suit for any “judicial act” that they perform. This immunity applies even when the judge acts maliciously or corruptly.
There is no set schedule. Some hearing offices say it will take approximately six weeks to receive a decision; some judges tell claimants they try to have the decision out in 30 days.
A judge is elevated to the bench either by election or by appointment by the Governor. A judge must also be a licensed attorney to be eligible to serve on the bench. A commissioner, on the other hand, is an individual who is hired by the court to help out with a judge’s case load.
Right to appeal or request a new trial. When your constitutional rights are breached during the criminal justice process, and the breach contributes to a guilty conviction, you can pursue an appeal based on an error in the criminal procedure or jury misconduct, or file a motion for a new trial.
According to California Penal Code 92, the bribery of any judicial officer is illegal.
To be sure, there are times that letters (written in consultation with an attorney) can be useful, such as at the time of sentencing. However, when a person is awaiting trial, writing a letter to the judge will not help. At best, the letter will go unread by the judge, and will be of no help.
Most courts will accept copies of electronically delivered letters, but be sure to check with the attorney first. Remember that judges read hundreds of letters. The easier you make it for the judge to read, the most likely the judge will be able to focus on the message you are trying to convey.
Normally in very hard cases the judges mention that the law has been created or changed, but the law cannot be reformulated according to the wish of the court. … So the judges do make laws but almost heresy to say so. Hence, judges have been upholding, declaring and making law.
Judges do not make law because the existing law provides all the resources for their decisions. A judge does not decide a case in a legal vacuum but on the basis of existing rules, which express, and, at the same time, are informed by, underlying legal principles.
In this context, it is relevant to note that Article 226A inserted in the Constitution by the 42nd amendment provided that a High Court cannot consider the constitutional validity of a Central legislation.
If no past cases with similar circumstances exist, a new decision is made, which would then become a precedent for a future similar case. If no statute law applies to cover a particular situation, common law will apply; however, statute law always overrides common law.