Contents
Many appeals do not have oral argument because all parties waive (give up) oral argument. When there is no oral argument, the Court of Appeal justices decide an appeal based on the briefs and the record on appeal.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTICE OF SUBMISSION WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT. A review of this case indicates that oral argument is not required and that the appeal may be decided on the briefs without prejudice to full consideration of the issues.
Oral argument is your chance to further explain to the appellate court in person the arguments that you made in your brief. … Oral argument is not a time to restate the facts of the case or repeat parts of the brief. The judges know what you said in your brief.
Oral arguments are spoken presentations to a judge or appellate court by a lawyer (or parties when representing themselves) of the legal reasons why they should prevail. … Oral argument is not always considered an essential part of due process, as the briefs also give the parties an opportunity to be heard by the court.
First, oral argument provides a unique opportunity for attorneys to converse with judges and be a part of the decision-making process. Second, oral argument is valuable for clients, who can see their concerns being addressed by the court and better understand how invested the judges are in the case.
After the oral arguments have been finished, the court meets, in its conference room, to reach a preliminary decision about the outcome of each case. When the justices disagree, the greater number becomes the majority of the court on that case. … The court may then vote to change the outcome.
When answering questions, respond to “yes” or “no” questions with appropriate honorifics. In most cases it is important to say “Yes, your honor” or “No, your honor.” Using “your honor” is the easiest way to show respect and avoid offending your judge.
The Court holds oral argument in about 70-80 cases each year. The arguments are an opportunity for the Justices to ask questions directly of the attorneys representing the parties to the case, and for the attorneys to highlight arguments that they view as particularly important.
(Many courts give you a quicker decision if you waive oral argument.) So why do it? If you can’t think of a good reason to orally argue the case, you’ll serve your client better by waiving it. Repeating your brief isn’t a good reason.
“No more than two pages, with annotated points in at least size 14 font. The outline should only be there as a backup, and it should be very easy to find the information you need.”
An appellate advocate often waives oral argument because he believes that the facts and legal issues are so clearly in his client’s favor that his client will prevail without the necessity of oral argument. The attorney who waives oral argument for this reason is taking a significant risk.
The mean time from oral argument to decision in the 7219 sample is 83.6 days (the median is 75), with a standard deviation of 46.2. 6. This holds for 99 percent of the cases. Only reargued cases are held over.
If you win your appeal, there will most likely be a Reversal for New Trial. When the appellate court reverses the trial court decision, a new trial is ordered that puts you back in the position you were in before trial court.
In a study of over 200 statements made by appellate judges, 80% of them said that oral arguments are very important to the resolution of cases. Former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, William Rehnquist, stated that oral argument has changed his ideas in somewhere between 25-50% of cases.
The best color to wear to court is probably navy blue or dark gray. These colors suggest seriousness. At the same time, they do not come with the negative connotations that are often associated with the color black (for instance, some people associate black with evil, coldness, and darkness).
There is no set schedule. Some hearing offices say it will take approximately six weeks to receive a decision; some judges tell claimants they try to have the decision out in 30 days.
A: On the average, about six weeks. Once a petition has been filed, the other party has 30 days within which to file a response brief, or, in some cases waive his/ her right to respond.
The Justices use the “Rule of Four” to decide if they will take the case. If four of the nine Justices feel the case has value, they will issue a writ of certiorari. This is a legal order from the high court for the lower court to send the records of the case to them for review.
Your apology letter to court format should include an apology, a brief description of your action, and what you plan to do to fix any problem caused. However, you do not want to sound insincere and apologize too much. You should always include sincere and heartfelt language, but do not go too over the top.
In person: In an interview, social event, or in court, address a judge as “Your Honor” or “Judge [last name].” If you are more familiar with the judge, you may call her just “Judge.” In any context, avoid “Sir” or “Ma’am.”
Case Law also states that when a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, he then loses subject matter jurisdiction and the Judges orders are void, of no legal force or affect.
The public may either download the audio files or listen to the recordings on the Court’s website. … The Court began audio recording oral arguments in 1955. The recordings are maintained at The National Archives and Records Administration.
Oral arguments are an important component in the Supreme Court’s decision-making process. In particular, they provide justices with information and offer a ”fresh perspective” when deciding cases (O’Brien 2008, 246; cf. … For Greenhouse, the justices’ behavior also meant they wanted to dismiss the case.
The implication is that the rules and norms of the Court’s decisional process provide information to help justices understand the consequences of their choices. We contend that oral arguments can influence Supreme Court justices’ decisions by providing information relevant for deciding a case.
Clearly and concisely explain the issues and state the reasons why you should win. Also be sure to include what, specifically, you are asking the court to do (overturn, affirm, reverse and remand, etc.). This part should be less than a minute. It needs to immediately grab the judges’ attention.
Typically, the Court hears cases that have been decided in either an appropriate U.S. Court of Appeals or the highest Court in a given state (if the state court decided a Constitutional issue). The Supreme Court has its own set of rules. According to these rules, four of the nine Justices must vote to accept a case.
The most common way for a case to reach the Supreme Court is on appeal from a circuit court. A party seeking to appeal a decision of a circuit court can file a petition to the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. … If a case is “denied cert”, the decision of the lower court is final.
The word certiorari comes from Law Latin and means “to be more fully informed.” A writ of certiorari orders a lower court to deliver its record in a case so that the higher court may review it. … The writ of certiorari is a common law writ, which may be abrogated or controlled entirely by statute or court rules.
Briefs are the written documents in which the attorneys in a case present their legal arguments to the court. When one researches a case, it is sometimes instructive to examine the written briefs that were filed by the parties, as well as the arguments presented orally to the court after the briefs were filed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCxvFwFE0ic