Provide students with explicit and detailed rubrics to accurately communicate expectations for student performance. If course material is highly technical, consider using ungraded, self-check quizzes as a formative assessment to check student learning and determine whether teaching strategies should be altered.
One-on-one or small group oral examinations can be conducted via any video conferencing tool such as Skype, Microsoft Teams, Zoom, Google Duo. Additionally, you can also consider students to role play or participate in debates via the online video conferencing platforms to assess their learning.
This type of check-in can be as simple as a “How are you doing right now?” or “How are you doing with distance learning?” It might even begin with a short conversation about a student’s life, such as, “How is dance going for you?” or “What video games are you into?” These little questions can send the message that you …
A Guide to Types of Assessment: Diagnostic, Formative, Interim, and Summative.
Reliability refers to the degree to which scores from a particular test are consistent from one use of the test to the next. Validity refers to the degree to which a test score can be interpreted and used for its intended purpose.
Reliability focuses on consistency in a student’s results. If the assessment tool is reliable, the student should score the same regardless of the day the assessment is given, the time of day, or who is grading it. If an assessment is valid, it will be reliable.
Peer feedback can be conducted online via a discussion board where students post their work, or a synchronous tool (e.g. Skype or Zoom) where students discuss each other’s work in real time. Many of your students will already be connected via social media, so encourage them to share work on these platforms too.
Set a task for students to give feedback to a fellow student (for example, using the given marking guide). Ask students to justify their reasoning and assessment when giving feedback. This also makes it possible to assess the student who gives feedback.
Yes, online tests can detect cheating. Various online proctoring software providers offer a host of anti-cheating methods to predict and prevent cheating instances that ensure integrity, credibility and lend authenticity to online exams.
Several institutions of higher learning are using proctored exams to prevent candidates from cheating. However, no technology is foolproof. Students can still cheat during an online proctored exam.
Honor codes — Honor codes are perhaps the simplest methods of deterring cheating in online courses, though they work only indirectly. According to the Texas State University, students who break this code can be dismissed from the program and may not receive their certificates of completion.
Assessment is integral to the teaching–learning process, facilitating student learning and improving instruction, and can take a variety of forms. Classroom assessment is generally divided into three types: assessment for learning, assessment of learning and assessment as learning.
There are two main types of assessment, each occurring at different points in the learning process: formative, which occurs both before and during the learning process, and summative, which occurs at the end of key segments in a learning cycle or the end of the learning process.
For example, if a department or program has identified effective oral communication as a learning goal or outcome, a direct assessment method involves observing and assessing students in the act of oral communication (e.g., via a presentation scored with a rubric).